Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you purchase via links on this page. **Results are individual and may vary.** Always consult a healthcare professional.

Establishing Trust and Transparency

How We Test Supplements: Our Full Scoring Methodology & Compliance Guidelines

The Foundation of Our Reviews

At **independentreviewz.com**, our primary commitment is to provide **unbiased, compliance-focused, and highly transparent** reviews. We are an independent publisher, and our editorial ratings are developed by analyzing manufacturer information, ingredient research, and public consumer sentiment, not by taking payment for higher scores. This methodology ensures we adhere strictly to best practices for affiliate marketing and regulatory guidelines, including Google Ads policies.

Our Editorial Integrity Promise

We do not accept money or incentives to give a product a higher rating. All affiliate compensation is earned only if a user chooses to purchase a product we genuinely recommend, but it does not influence the score itself. We focus solely on verifiable facts, ingredient quality, and safety profiles.

Our 5-Point Scoring Framework

Every supplement review is assigned a score out of 5, which is derived from the weighted average of five distinct, non-negotiable criteria. Each category is weighted based on its importance to consumer health, safety, and overall value.

  1. 1. Ingredient Quality & Clinical Support (30% Weight)

    This is the most critical factor. We assess whether the active ingredients are present in amounts supported by **independent, peer-reviewed scientific literature**. We look for recognized trademarks and clinically studied forms of the ingredients. Products using proprietary blends without dose transparency are heavily penalized in this category.

  2. 2. Label Transparency & Dosing (25% Weight)

    Compliance is key here. The highest scores go to manufacturers who clearly disclose the exact amounts (in milligrams or International Units) of every active ingredient. Transparency builds trust. We also verify that the stated dosage aligns with industry-accepted safety guidelines.

  3. 3. Safety Profile & Side Effects (20% Weight)

    We analyze potential interactions, common adverse effects reported in trials, and the presence of unnecessary fillers, artificial colors, or common allergens. A high score means the product is generally **well-tolerated** and poses a low risk for the average healthy adult. We strictly avoid products with questionable or banned substances.

  4. 4. Value for Money (15% Weight)

    This assesses the cost of the supplement relative to the quality, quantity, and research level of its ingredients. A "premium price" is acceptable if the formulation justifies it; cheap products with sub-therapeutic doses score poorly.

  5. 5. Brand Reputation & Support (10% Weight)

    We evaluate the manufacturer's history, their adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and their customer service policies, especially their refund/return guarantees. A reputable brand with a proven track record scores higher, as this minimizes consumer risk.

**Crucial Compliance Note:** We intentionally avoid making direct medical or disease-curing claims. Our reviews focus on the supplement's ability to **support** the body's natural functions (e.g., "supports digestive balance," not "cures IBS").